On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will take care of the loop optimizer passes.
Awesome. Thanks!
Diego.
Hi,
> Everything else should work well enough for passes to be converted.
> If anyone has some free cycles and are willing to put up with various
> broken bits, would you be willing to help converting passes? There is
> a list of the passes that need conversion in the tuples wiki
> (http://gcc.gn
The tuples branch is now in a state where code generation kind of
works well enough that it's possible to do some limited testing.
There are three big components that are still not totally functional:
EH lowering, OpenMP and mudflap. Aldy is finishing OpenMP and I will
be debugging the EH problems
> >The pretty print routines could definitely use a lot of cases
> >(dump_gimple_stmt), and the work is very self contained.
>
> So I took a look at this the other day, and you seem to have at least
> every case that has accessors.
>
> Did you want me to write accessors for the other types and th
On 5/7/07, Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan. Hi folks.
People (ok, so it was Dan) had asked if there was anything they could do to
help the tuples effort.
The pretty print routines could definitely use a lot of cases
(dump_gimple_stmt), and the work is very self contained.
So
Hi Dan. Hi folks.
People (ok, so it was Dan) had asked if there was anything they could do to
help the tuples effort.
The pretty print routines could definitely use a lot of cases
(dump_gimple_stmt), and the work is very self contained.
There is also the constructors and accessors for the IR.
