Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 3/9/20 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi Thomas, hi Overseers I can confirm that those are stripped off! I did sent an email with three attachments: * test.txt (text/plain) * test.diff (text/x-diff) * the company's disclaimer T

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 10:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > 6) there used to be a Raw text URL to grab the raw email, now there is nothing Based on info from #overseers ... While you can't download the raw text of an individual email now, you can get the entire month's mail in a compressed archive, from

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 19:57, Thomas König wrote: > As far as the advantages go: A per-thread view is nice, but I don't > think having it outweighs the disadvantages above. We always had a threaded view: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-bugs/2020-03/threads.html It just wasn't the default: https:/

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Overseers wrote: > 5) emails used to be sanitized against harvesters, now they aren't The pipermail munging feature was unusably bad (it messed up Texinfo diffs very badly, including in the mbox version of the archive, e.g. "+@node" at the start of a line w

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Thomas König
Hi, Some comments. Generally, I found the old format to be very good for navigating, and I would like to have the new one match the old one as closely as possible. 1) the by date monthly list of mails used to be ordered newest to oldest mails first, now it is oldest to newest, so when dealing

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped

2020-03-09 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 3/9/20 1:07 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 16:58, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 3/9/20 9:57 AM, Thomas König wrote: Hi, I concur with what Jakub wrote. The new web interface is much less useful than the old one; a severe regression for developers, so to speak. OMG I've just

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline

2020-03-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 16:58, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > On 3/9/20 9:57 AM, Thomas König wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I concur with what Jakub wrote. The new web interface is much less useful > > than the old one; a severe regression for developers, so to speak. > > OMG I've just looked. It's awful. Sor

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline

2020-03-09 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mär 09 2020, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > For example https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/date.html > just gives a list of emails, no dates shown. There's no indication what > the ordering is -- and apparently it is not most recent first. Heading says: Starting: Sun Mar 1 01:37:0

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline

2020-03-09 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 3/9/20 9:57 AM, Thomas König wrote: Hi, I concur with what Jakub wrote. The new web interface is much less useful than the old one; a severe regression for developers, so to speak. OMG I've just looked. It's awful. Sorry, but No. For example https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/20

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Thomas König
Hi, I concur with what Jakub wrote. The new web interface is much less useful than the old one; a severe regression for developers, so to speak. I also seem to have missed all discussion on this change (if there was anything). I do not understand why such a huge change was implemented that way,

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped

2020-03-09 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mär 09 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I use that to reply to mails that I don't have in my mailbox, because > I'm not sub'd to the list. With the raw text link you could download a > mailbox file of the mail, and so open it in your local MUA and reply > (with a correct In-Reply-To header, so th

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 10:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > 1) the by date monthly list of mails used to be ordered newest to oldest > mails first, now it is oldest to newest, so when dealing with new stuff one > has to always scroll down You can use #end to jump to the bottom. > 6) there used to be a Ra

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Hi Thomas, hi Overseers > > I can confirm that those are stripped off! > > I did sent an email with three attachments: > * test.txt (text/plain) > * test.diff (text/x-diff) > * the company's disclaimer > > The attachment with 'text

text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-03-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Thomas, hi Overseers I can confirm that those are stripped off! I did sent an email with three attachments: * test.txt (text/plain) * test.diff (text/x-diff) * the company's disclaimer The attachment with 'text/x-diff' MIME was removed :-( See: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/current/0