Hi,
On 11/18/22 00:04, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
The main advantage of this code compared to the equivalent ssize_t or
ptrdiff_t or idx_t code is that if you somehow write an off-by-one error, and
manage to access the array at [-1], if i is unsigned you'll access
[SIZE_MAX], which will definite
Hi Paul,
On 11/17/22 22:39, Paul Eggert wrote:
Second and more important, that code is bogus. Nobody should ever write code
like that. If I wrote code like that, I'd *want* a trap.
for (size_t i = 41; i < sizeof A / sizeof A[0]; --i) {
A[i] = something_nice;
}
The code above seems a bug by
