On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 00:06 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > The part of the scheduling change that I am interested in is the change in
> > where the addiu instruction occurs and the related changes from the positive
> > offsets to the negative offsets. Can anyone tell me where the code that
> > de
> The part of the scheduling change that I am interested in is the change in
> where the addiu instruction occurs and the related changes from the positive
> offsets to the negative offsets. Can anyone tell me where the code that
> decides to do that is? Extra bonus points for any answer not incl
I have an instruction scheduling question I was hoping someone could help me
with. Specifically, I am trying to figure out where and how GCC is deciding
to move the add of a constant to a register above the use of that register and
then changing the register usage by change the offsets associated
Alex Turjan wrote:
--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
Subject: Re: scheduling question
To: atur...@yahoo.com
Cc: "Vladimir Makarov" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 1:01 PM
Alex Turjan wrote:
Hi,
During scheduling Im confronted with the fa
Alex Turjan wrote:
Hi,
During scheduling Im confronted with the fact that an instruction is moved
from the ready list to queued with the cost 2, while according to my
expectations the insn should have been moved to queued with cost 1.
High, Alex. I could look at this, if you have a test and
--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
> Subject: Re: scheduling question
> To: atur...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "Vladimir Makarov" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 1:01 PM
> Alex Turjan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > During schedu
Alex Turjan wrote:
Hi,
During scheduling Im confronted with the fact that an instruction is moved
from the ready list to queued with the cost 2, while according to my
expectations the insn should have been moved to queued with cost 1.
Did anybody experience similar problem?
From what you desc
Hi,
During scheduling Im confronted with the fact that an instruction is moved
from the ready list to queued with the cost 2, while according to my
expectations the insn should have been moved to queued with cost 1.
Did anybody experience similar problem?
In case an insn is ready but can bot be
