From: David Miller
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:05:54 -0400 (EDT)
> So should expand_vector_broadcast() really provide this invariant to
> the vec_init expander, or does the vec_init expander need to tidy
> things up with gen_lowpart() etc. calls?
Richard I don't know if you had a chance to look in
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:07:31AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I think this is the same problem as Jakub is attacking here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02503.html
It has been checked in already. But my patch only deals
with the vector << vector case, vector << scalar
On 10/27/2011 10:05 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'm getting an ICE on 64-bit sparc for some vector test cases but
> I'm not sure where the fix belongs.
>
> When the compiler expands a vecor shift by scalar into a vector
> shift by a vector it uses expand_vector_broadcast(), which has
> a comment
I'm getting an ICE on 64-bit sparc for some vector test cases but
I'm not sure where the fix belongs.
When the compiler expands a vecor shift by scalar into a vector
shift by a vector it uses expand_vector_broadcast(), which has
a comment which states:
"The mode of OP must be the element mode of
