On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html says 17 Gb.
>>>
>>> I just did it, and it's up to 22 Gb.
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up, DJ! I had a look, and it is, i
On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html says 17 Gb.
>>
>> I just did it, and it's up to 22 Gb.
>
> Thanks for the heads up, DJ! I had a look, and it is, in fact,
> 184 Gb as of today, or 23 GB. (SCNR. :-)
You c
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, DJ Delorie wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html says 17 Gb.
>
> I just did it, and it's up to 22 Gb.
Thanks for the heads up, DJ! I had a look, and it is, in fact,
184 Gb as of today, or 23 GB. (SCNR. :-)
I am applying the patch below.
Gerald
Index: rsync.html
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html says 17 Gb.
I just did it, and it's up to 22 Gb.