On 6/30/21 12:16 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 6:32 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I had changed my approach to passing -Wno-free-nonheap-object in the
Makefile. Can you try disabling the Makefile bit and bootstrapping,
cause that was still failing.
I see. I just tested it and my patch do
On 6/28/21 6:32 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I had changed my approach to passing -Wno-free-nonheap-object in the
Makefile. Can you try disabling the Makefile bit and bootstrapping,
cause that was still failing.
I see. I just tested it and my patch does let the existing #pragma
suppress the warn
I had changed my approach to passing -Wno-free-nonheap-object in the
Makefile. Can you try disabling the Makefile bit and bootstrapping, cause
that was still failing.
Thanks.
Aldy
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, 00:29 Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/28/21 12:17 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/25/21
On 6/28/21 12:17 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/25/21 7:19 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 10:20 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post
my patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to
address a han
On 6/28/21 10:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:20 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post my
patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to address a
handful of meta-issues that may affect h
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:20 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> Hi folks.
>
> I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post my
> patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to address a
> handful of meta-issues that may affect how I post these patches.
First of all
On 6/25/21 7:19 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 10:20 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post
my patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to address
a handful of meta-issues that may affect how I p
On 6/25/21 10:20 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post my
patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to address a
handful of meta-issues that may affect how I post these patches.
Trapping on differences
Hi folks.
I'm done with benchmarking, testing and cleanups, so I'd like to post my
patchset for review. However, before doing so, I'd like to address a
handful of meta-issues that may affect how I post these patches.
Trapping on differences
===
Originally I wanted to con
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:54 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/21/2021 8:40 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
> > >> wro
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/21/2021 8:40 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
> >>>
> >>> What started as a foray into
On 6/21/2021 8:40 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backw
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
code. I'd like to discuss the po
On 6/14/2021 11:39 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/15/21 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/14/2021 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I bet it's going to be tougher to remove DOM's threader. It knows how
to do thinks like resolve memory references using temporary
equivalences
and such. But
On 6/15/21 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/14/2021 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I bet it's going to be tougher to remove DOM's threader. It knows how
to do thinks like resolve memory references using temporary equivalences
and such. But I bet it's enough to drop the VRP based threaders
On 6/14/2021 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I bet it's going to be tougher to remove DOM's threader. It knows how
to do thinks like resolve memory references using temporary equivalences
and such. But I bet it's enough to drop the VRP based threaders.
Yes. In fact I am wondering if addi
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:02 AM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/2021 5:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
> >
> > What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
> > dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
> > code. I'd like
On 6/9/2021 5:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
code. I'd like to discuss the possibility of replacing the current
backwards threader with
On 6/9/2021 2:39 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/9/21 9:47 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/9/2021 9:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing
On 6/9/21 9:47 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/9/2021 9:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evr
On 6/9/2021 9:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwa
On June 9, 2021 5:34:03 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
>>>
>>> What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
>>> dependency on evrp,
On 6/9/21 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
code. I'd like to discuss the po
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
>
> What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
> dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
> code. I'd like to discuss the possibility of replacing the current
>
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
code. I'd like to discuss the possibility of replacing the current
backwards threader with a new one that gets far more threads and can
p
25 matches
Mail list logo
