On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Probably the compiler doesn't in general like a paradoxical subreg that
> can take more hard regs than its SUBREG_REG. I think this is probably
> something that can be worked around with a proper combination of
> MODES_TIEABLE_P,
Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> > The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
> > DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
> > and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
> > The l
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:55:49PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> In general, operand_mode[] will be unreliable in cases where it is not
> specified. This is frowned upon but more or less permitted, and a few
> backends take advantage of it for relatively nefarious purposes.
I only have mode
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> Probably the compiler doesn't in general like a paradoxical subreg that
> can take more hard regs than its SUBREG_REG. I think this is probably
> something that can be worked around with a proper combination of
> MODES_TIEABLE_
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:30:34AM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
> DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
> and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
I meant to say t
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
The constraints are not met because the constraint "d" is register class
DX_REGS consisting of register 4 and 5, and (reg:HI 5 dh) spans register 5
and 6. Also, HARD_REGNO_NREGS (5, HImode) returns 0.
The lreg and greg dumps provide the clue that reload got the mo
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my i8086 backend experiments, I seem to have come across a corner case
> which confuses reload.
Interesting case.
> It seems necessary to recover the mode of the operand when computing
> rld[i].mode. There is operand_mode[rld[i].opnum] a
Hi.
In my i8086 backend experiments, I seem to have come across a corner case
which confuses reload. While building libgcc2 for one of the multilib
variants, GCC crashes:
libgcc2.c: In function '__muldc3':
libgcc2.c:1854: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
(insn:HI 2485 2483 2604 39 li