Re: reg-stack.c potpourri

2006-01-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Lucas \(a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) What would need to be done to reg-stack.c to allow other ports > besides i386 to use it? (support for multiple-stack machines would be > REALLY nice, but rather far off) (any other ideas?) reg-stack.c is pretty closed tied to

reg-stack.c potpourri

2006-01-27 Thread Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3)
1) What would need to be done to reg-stack.c to allow other ports besides i386 to use it? (support for multiple-stack machines would be REALLY nice, but rather far off) (any other ideas?) 2) I found a minor bug in the header comment for reg-stack.c -- when whoever wrote the comment documented