Re: recommend use of gperf version 3

2005-06-10 Thread Mike Stump
On Monday, June 6, 2005, at 06:03 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: Joseph S. Myers wrote: If the required version of any tool is changed then the documentation of that version in install.texi needs to be updated accordingly. Here is an updated patch. Looks reasonable to me. Would be good to hear t

Re: recommend use of gperf version 3

2005-06-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > If the required version of any tool is changed then the documentation of > that version in install.texi needs to be updated accordingly. Here is an updated patch. > The generated files in CVS will also need to be regenerated on commit. Yes. The one who commits it for me

Re: recommend use of gperf version 3

2005-06-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Bruno Haible wrote: > The files cp/cfns.gperf and java/keyword.gperf are - as distributed - > processed by gperf-2.7.2 or with particular options. The use of gperf-3.0.1 > (released in 2003) can create smaller and faster hash tables, with less > command line options: If the re

recommend use of gperf version 3

2005-06-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, The files cp/cfns.gperf and java/keyword.gperf are - as distributed - processed by gperf-2.7.2 or with particular options. The use of gperf-3.0.1 (released in 2003) can create smaller and faster hash tables, with less command line options: * cp/cfns.gperf: If you drop the options "-k '1-6,$'