Re: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Janis Johnson
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 22:47 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Janis Johnson wrote: > > > I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix > > suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at > > it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point li

Re: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Janis Johnson wrote: > I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix > suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at > it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants. Currently for > fixed-point GCC accepts any orderi

Re: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Fu, Chao-Ying
"Janis Johnson" wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 -0800, Fu, Chao-Ying wrote: > > Janis Johnson wrote: > > > > > > I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix > > > suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at > > > it I'm fixing suffixes for

RE: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Janis Johnson
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 -0800, Fu, Chao-Ying wrote: > Janis Johnson wrote: > > > > I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix > > suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at > > it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants. >

RE: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Fu, Chao-Ying
Janis Johnson wrote: > > I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix > suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at > it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants. > Currently for > fixed-point GCC accepts any ordering of the letter

Re: question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Janis Johnson writes: > My question, though, is about the case of the letters in the suffixes. > N1169 says "note that the suffix is case insensitive"; should I take > that literally and allow any mix of cases (as GCC currently does), or > require that the same case be used within a particular su

question: suffix for fixed-point literal constant

2009-02-11 Thread Janis Johnson
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants. Currently for fixed-point GCC accepts any ordering of the letters in the suffix. The technical rep