Alex Turjan wrote:
Vladimir thanks for help!
With respect to your answer I would like to point to you a possible way to solve the scheduling problem
(which I think wont be too difficult to be implemented in genautomata).
Alex, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I also thought about this a
tate.
regards,
Alex
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> From: Vladimir Makarov
> Subject: Re: query automaton
> To: atur...@yahoo.com
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 4:35 PM
> Alex Turjan wrote:
> > Dear Vladimir,
> >
Alex Turjan wrote:
Dear Vladimir,
Not really. There is no requirement for "the units
part of the alternatives of a reservation must belong to the
same automaton". Querying should also work in this
case because function cpu_unit_reservation_p checks all
automata for an unit reservation.
Dear Vladimir,
> Not really. There is no requirement for "the units
> part of the alternatives of a reservation must belong to the
> same automaton". Querying should also work in this
> case because function cpu_unit_reservation_p checks all
> automata for an unit reservation.
Indeed it che
Alex Turjan wrote:
Hello,
Some time ago I asked a question regarding the possibility to schedule an operation on alternative functional units (FUs) AND depending on the chosen FUs to generate a dedicated assembly mnemonic.
To give a simple example suppose I have a move operation that can be is
Hello,
Some time ago I asked a question regarding the possibility to schedule an
operation on alternative functional units (FUs) AND depending on the chosen FUs
to generate a dedicated assembly mnemonic.
To give a simple example suppose I have a move operation that can be issued on
one of the
