Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix to specify a binary
>number in GCC/C++, will there be any resistance to add %b format
>specifier to the printf family format strings?
>
> You can do that yourself by using the hook facility for printf, see
> (libc) Custo
Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix to specify a binary
number in GCC/C++, will there be any resistance to add %b format
specifier to the printf family format strings?
You can do that yourself by using the hook facility for printf, see
(libc) Customizing Printf in the GNU C library
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
> > project.
>
> In that case it certainly isn't a GCC issue.
Assuming this feature is accepted in glibc, you'll want to update GCC's
-Wformat flag.
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
> project.
In that case it certainly isn't a GCC issue.
On 01/22/2010 12:31 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> You sure? Isn't the implementation of printf formatting engine a part
> of GCC support libraries
The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
project.
Paolo.
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> This has absolutely nothing to do with GCC and its development, you
> understand.
You sure? Isn't the implementation of printf formatting engine a part
of GCC support libraries and doesn't adding an extension to it
belong to the category "development"?
On 01/22/2010 12:01 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix
> to specify a binary number in GCC/C++,
> will there be any resistance to add %b
> format specifier to the printf family format
> strings?
>
This has absolutely nothing to do with GCC and its development,
Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix
to specify a binary number in GCC/C++,
will there be any resistance to add %b
format specifier to the printf family format
strings?
Best regards
Piotr Wyderski
