Re: ppc: const data not in RO section

2010-12-01 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Nathan Froyd wrote on 2010/12/01 18:33:23: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:04:06PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Why is not > > const char cstr[] = "mystr"; > > const int myint = 3; > > added to a read only section? > > Especially since > > const int myarr[]={1,2,3}; > > is placed in .ro

Re: ppc: const data not in RO section

2010-12-01 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Nathan Froyd wrote on 2010/12/01 18:33:23: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:04:06PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Why is not > > const char cstr[] = "mystr"; > > const int myint = 3; > > added to a read only section? > > Especially since > > const int myarr[]={1,2,3}; > > is placed in .ro

Re: ppc: const data not in RO section

2010-12-01 Thread Nathan Froyd
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:04:06PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Why is not > const char cstr[] = "mystr"; > const int myint = 3; > added to a read only section? > Especially since > const int myarr[]={1,2,3}; > is placed in .rodata. > > hmm, -G 0 does place these in .rodata but why do I

ppc: const data not in RO section

2010-11-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Why is not const char cstr[] = "mystr"; const int myint = 3; added to a read only section? Especially since const int myarr[]={1,2,3}; is placed in .rodata. hmm, -G 0 does place these in .rodata but why do I have to specify that?