Re: po file update

2005-06-15 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I submitted it to the TP a week ago. Sorry it took so long. Karl is on vacation, and I was busy with other stuff. Please verify whether the merge indeed had the desired effect. > Perhaps there is some problem with the updating of the TP site? Also that. DIRO (UMontreal

Re: po file update

2005-06-15 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:43:47PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: Right now, the libstdc++ versioning/ABI situation is is all that stands between us and 4.0.1 RC2, now that Jakub has fixed the GLIBC miscompilation. Weren't we wa

Re: po file update

2005-06-15 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:43:47PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > Right now, the libstdc++ versioning/ABI situation is is all that stands > > between us and 4.0.1 RC2, now that Jakub has fixed the GLIBC miscompilation. > > Weren't we waiting for the u

po file update

2005-06-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:43:47PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Right now, the libstdc++ versioning/ABI situation is is all that stands > between us and 4.0.1 RC2, now that Jakub has fixed the GLIBC miscompilation. Weren't we waiting for the updated po files (at least for the translations that w