Given the age of paranoia (the version included
with RTEMS is from Cygnus circa 1993), does this
sound familiar or is this a new issue?
What happens if you use -mno-fused-madd option?
Same result for me using RTEMS on psim. Eric N. will
have to give a Mac report.
I tested it (the source fro
Joern Rennecke wrote:
Given the age of paranoia (the version included
with RTEMS is from Cygnus circa 1993), does this
sound familiar or is this a new issue?
Is this related to PR29100?
I don't think so since I was using 4.2.1
and tried that option upon someone else's
suggestion.
FWIW
> Given the age of paranoia (the version included
> with RTEMS is from Cygnus circa 1993), does this
> sound familiar or is this a new issue?
Is this related to PR29100?
Tim Prince wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 19:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
Should we know which version of Paranoia this is?
It's the version having been integrated into the rtems source tree many
years ago:
http://www.rtems.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtems/testsuites/sampl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 19:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
Should we know which version of Paranoia this is?
It's the version having been integrated into the rtems source tree many
years ago:
http://www.rtems.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtems/testsuites/samples/paranoia/paranoi
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 19:00 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> Should we know which version of Paranoia this is?
It's the version having been integrated into the rtems source tree many
years ago:
http://www.rtems.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtems/testsuites/samples/paranoia/paranoia.c
> or guess which fla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In analyzing the output of paranoia, Eric Norum
and I have noticed that when compiled at
default optimization levels, the results
are reported to have a flaw. When compiled
with no optimization, paranoia reports no flaws.
I tried this with RTEMS running on psim usi
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On 7/23/07, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the age of paranoia (the version included
with RTEMS is from Cygnus circa 1993), does this
sound familiar or is this a new issue?
What happens if you use -mno-fused-madd option?
Same result for me using RTEMS on
On 7/23/07, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the age of paranoia (the version included
with RTEMS is from Cygnus circa 1993), does this
sound familiar or is this a new issue?
What happens if you use -mno-fused-madd option?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Hi,
In analyzing the output of paranoia, Eric Norum
and I have noticed that when compiled at
default optimization levels, the results
are reported to have a flaw. When compiled
with no optimization, paranoia reports no flaws.
I tried this with RTEMS running on psim using
gcc 4.2.1. RTEMS uses
10 matches
Mail list logo