> On Oct 11, 2006, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> int x; int f() { x = 0;
> >> while(1); }
>
> >> We get line number notes for code only up to "x = 0;".
>
> > I assume this is only a problem when not optimizing.
>
> The opposite, actually. It's optimization that breaks it
On Oct 11, 2006, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> int x; int f() { x = 0;
>> while(1); }
>> We get line number notes for code only up to "x = 0;".
> I assume this is only a problem when not optimizing.
The opposite, actually. It's optimization that breaks it.
Of course optimiz
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-07/msg00399.html
> added code to remove line number notes from the end of basic blocks
> after say turning a jump at the end of a basic block into a
> fallthrough edge.
>
> This unfortunately causes
Hi, Jan,
The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-07/msg00399.html
added code to remove line number notes from the end of basic blocks
after say turning a jump at the end of a basic block into a
fallthrough edge.
This unfortunately causes line number info from becoming incorrect for
te
