Re: nvptx multilib setup

2022-05-13 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Tom! On 2022-02-04T13:09:29+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc wrote: > On 2/4/22 08:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2022-02-03T13:35:55+, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" >> wrote: >>> I've tested this using (recommended) driver 470.94 on boards: >>> while iterating over dimensions { -

Re: nvptx multilib setup (was: [Bug target/104364] [12 Regression] OpenMP/nvptx regressions after "[nvptx] Add some support for .local atomics")

2022-02-04 Thread Tom de Vries via Gcc
On 2/4/22 08:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi Tom! Taking this one to the mailing list; not directly related to PR104364: On 2022-02-03T13:35:55+, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104364 I've tested this using (recommended) drive

nvptx multilib setup (was: [Bug target/104364] [12 Regression] OpenMP/nvptx regressions after "[nvptx] Add some support for .local atomics")

2022-02-03 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Tom! Taking this one to the mailing list; not directly related to PR104364: On 2022-02-03T13:35:55+, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104364 > I've tested this using (recommended) driver 470.94 on boards: (As not every user w