Re: non-ambiguous typedefs

2005-11-11 Thread Mark Mitchell
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Plain compiler bug. I'm not aware of any existing report to that > effect, though GCC/g++ currently is completely confused when it sees > apparently ambiguous declarations, and would report non-existent > declaration. That needs fixing. I have a patch-in-progress for t

Re: non-ambiguous typedefs

2005-11-09 Thread Joerg Richter
> Plain compiler bug. I'm not aware of any existing report to that > effect, IMHO http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9726 is the same bug Joerg

Re: non-ambiguous typedefs

2005-11-08 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Howard Hinnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi All, | | I'm wondering if the following behavior is: | | 1. An already reported bug. | 2. Not reported, I need to file a bugzilla. | 3. Disputed. | | Here's the test case: | | typedef unsigned short ushort; | | namespace X | { | typedef

non-ambiguous typedefs

2005-11-08 Thread Howard Hinnant
Hi All, I'm wondering if the following behavior is: 1. An already reported bug. 2. Not reported, I need to file a bugzilla. 3. Disputed. Here's the test case: typedef unsigned short ushort; namespace X { typedef unsigned short ushort; } using namespace X; int main() { ushort us =