Re: mn10300, invariants on DEP_PRO/DEP_CON and on TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST params

2014-07-18 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/08/14 14:21, David Malcolm wrote: [CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question] I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in RTL; see [1] for more info on that. I noticed that mn10300 has this implementation of a target hook: #define TARGET_SCHED_ADJUS

Re: mn10300, invariants on DEP_PRO/DEP_CON and on TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST params

2014-07-11 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 10:13 +1200, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:21 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > [CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question] > > > > I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in > > RTL; see [1] for more info on that. > > > >

Re: mn10300, invariants on DEP_PRO/DEP_CON and on TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST params

2014-07-10 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:21 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > [CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question] > > I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in > RTL; see [1] for more info on that. > > I noticed that mn10300 has this implementation of a target hook: > #defi

mn10300, invariants on DEP_PRO/DEP_CON and on TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST params

2014-07-08 Thread David Malcolm
[CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question] I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in RTL; see [1] for more info on that. I noticed that mn10300 has this implementation of a target hook: #define TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST mn10300_adjust_sched_cost Within mn