On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the purposes of static analysis, can the output of
> -fdump-tree-original-raw complete for reconstructing GENERIC data?
To reconstruct GIMPLE completely? No. All data types definitions are
missing, for example.
Depending
Well currently the fortran front-end scalarizes those operators. But
the fortran frontend has it's own ast which gets translated to gimple
so you might to take a look into that instead of gimple.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2010, at 9:10 PM, "Marcus G. Daniels"
wrote:
Andrew Pinski
Andrew Pinski wrote:
How about doing a plugin instead?
I took a peek at the Treehydra plugin from Mozilla that does pre-GENERIC
for C++.
That looks like it would work, but we're concerned with Fortran, and
indeed would like to preserve things like Fortran array-level
operators. The GENERI
How about doing a plugin instead?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2010, at 8:21 PM, "Marcus G. Daniels"
wrote:
Hi all,
For the purposes of static analysis, can the output of -fdump-tree-
original-raw complete for reconstructing GENERIC data? Packages
like treehydra are intriguing, but
Hi all,
For the purposes of static analysis, can the output of
-fdump-tree-original-raw complete for reconstructing GENERIC data?
Packages like treehydra are intriguing, but they aren't complete, for
example, for Fortran.
Thanks,
Marcus Daniels
