On 03/02/15 09:14, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 2 February 2015 at 21:54, Paul Shortis wrote:
I could have avoided the expander and used a single instruction pattern for
a)b)c) if if could have found a way to have alternative dependent clobbers
in an instruction pattern. I investigated attributes b
On 2 February 2015 at 21:54, Paul Shortis wrote:
> I could have avoided the expander and used a single instruction pattern for
> a)b)c) if if could have found a way to have alternative dependent clobbers
> in an instruction pattern. I investigated attributes but couldn't see how I
> would be able
On 02/02/15 18:55, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 01/30/2015 11:16 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Yury Gribov writes:
On 01/29/2015 08:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit
shifts. So
I've handled variable / m
On 01/30/2015 11:16 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Yury Gribov writes:
On 01/29/2015 08:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts. So
I've handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline s
Yury Gribov writes:
> On 01/29/2015 08:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
> >> I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts. So
> >> I've handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline shifts
> >> and calls to assembler su
On 01/29/2015 08:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts. So I've
handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline shifts and calls to
assembler support functions.
The calls to the asm
On 01/29/15 10:32, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts. So I've
handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline shifts and calls to
assembler support functions.
The calls to the asm libra
On 01/29/2015 02:08 AM, Paul Shortis wrote:
> I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts. So I've
> handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline shifts and calls to
> assembler support functions.
>
> The calls to the asm library functions clobber only one (by con
I've ported GCC to a small 16 bit CPU that has single bit shifts.
So I've handled variable / multi-bit shifts using a mix of inline
shifts and calls to assembler support functions.
The calls to the asm library functions clobber only one (by
const) or two (variable) registers but of course call
