MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bug-libtool@gnu.org
Cc: libtool-patches@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: libjava build times]
Mail-Followup-To: Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
bug-libtool@gnu.org, libtool-patches@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:31:05PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Could you please go to http://wiki.mirbsd.de/MirbsdKsh, get the source,
> compile it and try with it instead of your usual /bin/sh (I suppose GNU
> bash) again?
>
> I'd be interested if that warrants a noticeable speedup.
No visib
Andrew Haley dixit:
>Richard Henderson writes:
> >
> > Now, unless I've done something drastically wrong, it appears as if we
> > are spending 2/3 of our time in the libtool script.
>
>Yes, that's right. That's similar to what my oprofile experiments suggest.
Could you please go to http://wiki.
Richard Henderson writes:
>
> Now, unless I've done something drastically wrong, it appears as if we
> are spending 2/3 of our time in the libtool script.
Yes, that's right. That's similar to what my oprofile experiments suggest.
Andrew.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:33:43AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> OK, so the low-hanging fruit that remains is the libtools script and
> the linker. In the latter case, it seems that the big link causes
> severe problems with small memory systems.
I did some experiments today just to see what kind
