Re: libgfortran generated and long double calls

2007-05-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:50:53AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >A quick stab at changing... > >specific__exp_r16 = exp (parm) > > to > >specific__exp_r16 = expl (parm) > > ...in gcc/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90 > produced the followimg compilation error on > Darwin PPC... > >

RE: libgfortran generated and long double calls

2007-05-26 Thread Jack Howarth
A quick stab at changing... specific__exp_r16 = exp (parm) to specific__exp_r16 = expl (parm) ...in gcc/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90 produced the followimg compilation error on Darwin PPC... ../../../gcc-4.2-20070526/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90:47.23: specific__exp_r1

libgfortran generated and long double calls

2007-05-26 Thread Jack Howarth
While looking at Andrew's patch for fixing the long double issue on Darwin PPC, I noticed something interesting in the symbols in the object files created for gcc/libgfortran/generated. Some of these object files have symbols with the proper $LDBL128 appended on Darwin PPC. For example... nm rr