On 01/23/2010 04:29 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
We could warn about this when building with C++ but with C we do not
see bools but ints here.
With such a warning there would be no reason not to build stage2 and
stage3 with bool == _Bool.
Paolo
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:21:47AM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>> [This started on gcc-patches]
>> Quoting Richard Guenther :
> [...]
>> > bool all_critical_edge_p = true;
>> > all_critical_edge_p &= e->flags & EDGE_CRITICAL;
> [...]
>>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:21:47AM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> [This started on gcc-patches]
> Quoting Richard Guenther :
[...]
> > bool all_critical_edge_p = true;
> > all_critical_edge_p &= e->flags & EDGE_CRITICAL;
[...]
> I think a better long-term plan would be to add an option to insert
[This started on gcc-patches]
Quoting Richard Guenther :
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/23/2010 01:36 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Ugh. I wonder if we should use _Bool instead of int
if the host compiler supports it.
Then we'd have another share of bugs if someo
