On 08/12/13 08:07, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
My conclusion therefore is i386/ELF was not maintained, as far as the
return convention is concerned, beyond r34721 and it looks to me like it
should have been converted with r45726 to make use of
ix86_return_in_memory just like generic i386, perhaps
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i386elf.h defines:
> >
> > /* The ELF ABI for the i386 says that records and unions are returned
> >in memory. */
> >
> > #define SUBTARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY(TYPE, FNTYPE) \
> >
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Hi,
> i386elf.h defines:
>
> /* The ELF ABI for the i386 says that records and unions are returned
>in memory. */
>
> #define SUBTARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY(TYPE, FNTYPE) \
> (TYPE_MODE (TYPE) == BLKmode \
> || (VECTOR_MODE_
Hi,
i386elf.h defines:
/* The ELF ABI for the i386 says that records and unions are returned
in memory. */
#define SUBTARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY(TYPE, FNTYPE) \
(TYPE_MODE (TYPE) == BLKmode \
|| (VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (TYPE)) && int_size_in_bytes (TYPE) == 8))
and as such d
