Re: i387 control word reg definition is missing

2005-05-23 Thread Sylvain Pion
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > This change is needed to get i387 status word switching instructions in > (int)->(float) conversions out of the loops, i.e.: > > int i; > double d; > > for (x = 0... { >i[x] = d[x]; > } I think it would also be very useful to hav

i387 control word reg definition is missing

2005-05-23 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! It looks that i387 control word register definition is missing from register definitions for i386 processor. Inside i386.h, we have: #define FIXED_REGISTERS \ /*ax,dx,cx,bx,si,di,bp,sp,st,st1,st2,st3,st4,st5,st6,st7*/ \ { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1