mrs wrote:
> [...] The question is, how decent are the results and can you spot
> any systematic wrongs that appear and/or can you identify any
> non-portableness to darwin of mudflap? I started from 89
> passes... > :-) [...]
Most of the FAILs are "output pattern test" failures, related to so
On Thursday, March 17, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
So, I've been working on mudflap for darwin8, and these are the
results I get... I know what you're thinking, it's impossible to get
it working because it doesn't have --wrap and friends.. well, I
pulled some magic pixie dust out and
So, I've been working on mudflap for darwin8, and these are the
results I get... I know what you're thinking, it's impossible to get
it working because it doesn't have --wrap and friends.. well, I
pulled some magic pixie dust out and sprinkled it around and it's
starting to work...
The q
