> > Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
>
> yes, it is. Thanks,
Done!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> style nits: It should be size_t(__len - __pos), and not
>> (size_t)(__len - __pos). Same for the other hunk. Patch OK with
>> those changes.
>
> Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
yes, it is. Thanks,
-- Gaby
> style nits: It should be size_t(__len - __pos), and not
> (size_t)(__len - __pos). Same for the other hunk. Patch OK with
> those changes.
Committed that way. Thanks! Ok for 4.7 branch as well?
* include/bits/random.tcc (seed_seq::generate): Cast max()
operands to size_t to
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
necessary because of platforms where size_t is unsigned short (I didn't know
those existed...)
Well, I suspect AVR might be such platform but I do not seem to have an
ABI document for AVR yet... (h
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnos
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
>>> points to the function declaration, not to an act
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
points to the function declaration, not to an actual binary
expression, and
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>> I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
>> points to the function declaration, not to an actual binary
>> expression, and I can't figure out what it's compla
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
> points to the function declaration, not to an actual binary
> expression, and I can't figure out what it's complaining about:
My mailer uses proportional fonts so I can't make
I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
points to the function declaration, not to an actual binary
expression, and I can't figure out what it's complaining about:
/greed/dj/m32c/gcc/h8300-elf/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/greed/dj/m32c/gcc/h8300-elf/./gcc -nostdinc++
-
10 matches
Mail list logo