Hi!
On 02/11/13 19:22, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/02/2013 08:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 2 November 2013 18:57, Mischa Baars wrote:
*I understand, however it seems more logical to use the destination
type to **
**determine the type of the first and second operand. *
No. No it does not.
On 11/02/2013 08:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 2 November 2013 18:57, Mischa Baars wrote:
I understand, however it seems more logical to use the destination type to
determine the type of the first and second operand.
Are you completely sure this is the desired behaviour?
It's the behaviour
On 2 November 2013 18:57, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> I understand, however it seems more logical to use the destination type to
> determine the type of the first and second operand.
>
> Are you completely sure this is the desired behaviour?
It's the behaviour required by the C standard, so yes, it is
On 11/02/2013 07:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
Here's the examples again, now each bug in a separate file. Hope it helps...
Just compile with 'make' and run the executable. The source code is
documented, so any questions you might have will
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> Here's the examples again, now each bug in a separate file. Hope it helps...
>
> Just compile with 'make' and run the executable. The source code is
> documented, so any questions you might have will probably be answered by
> reading the com
Hi,
Here's the examples again, now each bug in a separate file. Hope it helps...
Just compile with 'make' and run the executable. The source code is
documented, so any questions you might have will probably be answered by
reading the comments.
Regards,
Mischa.
On 11/02/2013 07:10 PM, Dan Ke
