On 3/26/07, Joseph S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > use of -Wformat-contains-nul
>
> But, you do think the option is useful overall, then, and that Bruce
> should proceed with the additional steps you mention?
Yes, I think it makes sense in principle (and the existing patch is
p
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Bruce Korb wrote:
> >
> >> This bootstraps in Linux i686 & I can use -Wno-format-contains-nul to
> >> suppress that warning. OK?
> >
> > This is not a complete patch submission, I await one with document
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
>> This bootstraps in Linux i686 & I can use -Wno-format-contains-nul to
>> suppress that warning. OK?
>
> This is not a complete patch submission, I await one with documentation
> and testcases (both for the option disabling the
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Bruce Korb wrote:
> This bootstraps in Linux i686 & I can use -Wno-format-contains-nul to
> suppress that warning. OK?
This is not a complete patch submission, I await one with documentation
and testcases (both for the option disabling the diagnostic and for the
use of -Wf
This bootstraps in Linux i686 & I can use -Wno-format-contains-nul to
suppress that warning. OK?
Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I mess around with a lot of generated code. That means I do automated
> construction of libraries that use literal strings. In order to
> reduce address fixups, I oft
Hello,
I mess around with a lot of generated code. That means I do automated
construction of libraries that use literal strings. In order to
reduce address fixups, I often put all the literal strings into one long
string with each piece separated from the others with a NUL byte.
Unfortunately, I
