On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, David Kunsman wrote:
> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking
> down what has been and what needs to be down an
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:16:26 +0100
Martin Jambor wrote:
> Yes, I think that even just moving hopelessly outdated stuff to some
> "Archive" section, looking at what is left and then perhaps
> re-organizing the sections on the main page (and perhaps a few similar
> ones) would be great, if you have
On 25 March 2015 at 05:34, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 03:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I don't see any need to move pages (that would break old links).
>
>
> So why not fix links as well?
I mean other sites that link to gcc.gnu.org/wiki ... so we don't control them.
On 03/24/2015 03:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote:
Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down th
On 24 March 2015 at 12:33, Martin Jambor wrote:
> This is exactly what I actually had in mind.
Ah gotcha - then that's two voices in favour :-)
I think as long as you don't actually rename pages then the wiki
preserves quite good history, so we will always be able to go back to
look at past versi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote:
> >> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
> >> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
> >> planning on doing
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote:
>> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
>> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
>> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking
>> down what has been a
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote:
> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking
> down what has been an
Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking
down what has been and what needs to be down and updating all the
wikis. Do you think this is so
