On Friday 11 November 2011 16:27:18 Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Thanks Mike, silly me, it seems that crosstool_ng is exactly what I need!
>
> Off-topic, but .. anyone have a clue about why my canadian-cross of
> gcc is picking up its own internal limits.h, instead of glibc's
> limits.h? Since gcc's lim
Linas Vepstas writes:
> Thanks Mike, silly me, it seems that crosstool_ng is exactly what I need!
>
> Off-topic, but .. anyone have a clue about why my canadian-cross of
> gcc is picking up its own internal limits.h, instead of glibc's
> limits.h? Since gcc's limits.h doesn't have ‘SSIZE_MAX’ whi
Thanks Mike, silly me, it seems that crosstool_ng is exactly what I need!
Off-topic, but .. anyone have a clue about why my canadian-cross of
gcc is picking up its own internal limits.h, instead of glibc's
limits.h? Since gcc's limits.h doesn't have ‘SSIZE_MAX’ which
gcc/config/host-linux.c wants.
comes up every few years
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2011-08/msg00073.html
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 11/9/2011 12:28 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
"the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
I configure gcc
Hi Joeseph,
On 9 November 2011 11:39, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
>> I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
>> "the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
>>
>> Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
> "the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
>
> Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
> provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
> I config
I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
"the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
I configure gcc with --enable-shared. But doing so causes
gcc
