Hello!
I am trying to slightly modify the source code of GCC to display some
messages when the compiler is executed in the terminal. For example, when
'gcc source.c' is executed, I want a print message saying "Building with
GCC..." and if the build is successful, "Build Successful!" should be
disp
I sent this note after reading "Final install" and seeing the buildstat.html
hasn't had 14.x yet, indicating my success in building and installing GCC.
config.guess output:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
gcc -v output:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:51 AM Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
> Building on Mac with Clang I get warnings like this:
>
> ../../../gcc/gcc/cgraph.h:2629:28: warning: struct 'cgraph_edge' was
> previously declared as a class; this is valid, but may result in linker
> errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI
Building on Mac with Clang I get warnings like this:
../../../gcc/gcc/cgraph.h:2629:28: warning: struct 'cgraph_edge' was previously
declared as a class; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the
Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
It seems to be talking about a MS bug (since C
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 12:54 AM James K. Lowden
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:03:12 -0700
> Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
>
> > > Building a full distribution of this tree isn't done
> > > via 'make dist'. Check out the etc/ subdirectory
> ...
> > You just tar up the source.
> > Yo
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:03:12 -0700
Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> > Building a full distribution of this tree isn't done
> > via 'make dist'. Check out the etc/ subdirectory
...
> You just tar up the source.
> You could use maintainer-scripts/gcc_release to make a snapshot but in
> th
--
From: Andrew Pinski
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 15:03
To: Robert Dubner
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: How do I create a GCC source code tarball?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 4:32 PM Robert Dubner wrote:
>
> I have modified the source code of GCC, and I need a tarball for that
> modifie
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 4:32 PM Robert Dubner wrote:
>
> I have modified the source code of GCC, and I need a tarball for that
> modified source.
>
> My code is based on the trunk branch of the repository at
> git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
>
> I attempted to execute "make dist", and have encountere
I have modified the source code of GCC, and I need a tarball for that
modified source.
My code is based on the trunk branch of the repository at
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
I attempted to execute "make dist", and have encountered the response
Building a full distribution of this tree isn
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 8:14 PM Mohamed Atef via Gcc wrote:
>
> After i built it
> I tried make - j 8 and it's recompiling now i thought i will have messege
> like
> Every thing is up to date or there are no change done
> But it actually started to compile again
If you modify parts of gcc/ only th
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 06 2022, Mohamed Atef via Gcc wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I built gcc from the repo and it took around 2 hours but I am
> wondering should I wait two hours after every modification?
> Is there any way to recompile faster.
> That's very important as we will add some files
45 mins and i am waiting
في الأحد، ٦ فبراير، ٢٠٢٢ ٩:١٨ م Mir Immad كتب:
> The build system probably first tries to make sure if everything is in
> place and if there were any changes and re-compiles the new/changed files.
>
> How much time does it take when you try to rebuild?
>
> On Mon, Feb 7,
The build system probably first tries to make sure if everything is in
place and if there were any changes and re-compiles the new/changed files.
How much time does it take when you try to rebuild?
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 12:43 AM Mohamed Atef
wrote:
> After i built it
> I tried make - j 8 and it'
After i built it
I tried make - j 8 and it's recompiling now i thought i will have messege
like
Every thing is up to date or there are no change done
But it actually started to compile again
في الأحد، ٦ فبراير، ٢٠٢٢ ٩:٠٨ م Mir Immad كتب:
> Yes, that is right.
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 12:38 AM M
Yes, that is right.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 12:38 AM Mohamed Atef
wrote:
> Hello,
> Only modified files will be recompiled, won't it?
>
>
> في الأحد، ٦ فبراير، ٢٠٢٢ ٩:٠٥ م Mir Immad كتب:
>
>> Make sure to use all the cores available.
>>
>> make -j N
>>
>> e.g; make -j 8
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb
Hello,
Only modified files will be recompiled, won't it?
في الأحد، ٦ فبراير، ٢٠٢٢ ٩:٠٥ م Mir Immad كتب:
> Make sure to use all the cores available.
>
> make -j N
>
> e.g; make -j 8
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 12:26 AM Mohamed Atef via Gcc
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> I built g
Make sure to use all the cores available.
make -j N
e.g; make -j 8
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 12:26 AM Mohamed Atef via Gcc wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I built gcc from the repo and it took around 2 hours but I am
> wondering should I wait two hours after every modification?
> Is there any w
Hello everyone,
I built gcc from the repo and it took around 2 hours but I am
wondering should I wait two hours after every modification?
Is there any way to recompile faster.
That's very important as we will add some files and tests for OMPD.
Thanks
On 16 February 2015 at 17:45, Jonny Grant wrote:
> While I remember:
> Stroustrup lists C++ extensions as .cxx and .cpp
> http://www.stroustrup.com/glossary.html
>
> ISO sample sources use .cpp:
> http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c043351_ISO_IEC_TR_18015_2006(E).zip
>
> .C i
On 2 February 2015 at 23:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 2 February 2015 at 21:11, Jonny Grant wrote:
>> Is this a consensus agreement to rename those .C -> .cc ?
>
> No.
While I remember:
Stroustrup lists C++ extensions as .cxx and .cpp
http://www.stroustrup.com/glossary.html
ISO sample sources
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:17 +, Jonny Grant wrote:
> On 03/02/15 23:20, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Jonny Grant writes:
> >
> >> How many minutes labor is this task?
> >
> > What does it fix?
>
> Consistency. Less important if these files are only compiled after GCC
> available, to use as a tes
On 03/02/15 23:20, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonny Grant writes:
How many minutes labor is this task?
What does it fix?
Consistency. Less important if these files are only compiled after GCC
available, to use as a testsuite. Although I understood from other
replies that other files needed h
On 4 February 2015 at 00:22, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
> How many hacks/workarounds can be avoided?
How many new hacks/workaround will be needed for exploring the files'
version control history, even with a VCS that supports renaming?
Renaming the files has downsides as well as upsi
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix)
wrote:
>
>> Am 04.02.2015 um 00:20 schrieb Andreas Schwab :
>>
>> Jonny Grant writes:
>>
>>> How many minutes labor is this task?
>>
>> What does it fix?
>
> How many hacks/workarounds can be avoided?
None.
> Am 04.02.2015 um 00:20 schrieb Andreas Schwab :
>
> Jonny Grant writes:
>
>> How many minutes labor is this task?
>
> What does it fix?
How many hacks/workarounds can be avoided?
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Jonny Grant wrote:
> > There are around 11k files that have the .C ending to them; all in the
> > testsuite. I don't think it make sense to move them.
>
> How many minutes labor is this task?
It's desirable for test names to be stable so that results can be compared
over ti
Jonny Grant writes:
> How many minutes labor is this task?
What does it fix?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On 02/02/15 21:18, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
On 01/02/15 16:34, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
From: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gc
On 2 February 2015 at 21:11, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Is this a consensus agreement to rename those .C -> .cc ?
No.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
>
>
> On 01/02/15 16:34, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
>>>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
From: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org"
,
On 01/02/15 16:34, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
From: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , Jonny
Grant
These files are only compiled by GCC's own build system, with GCC's
o
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 23:24 +0100, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix)
wrote:
> > Am 30.01.2015 um 22:39 schrieb DJ Delorie :
> >
> >
> > pins...@gmail.com writes:
> >> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
> >
> > However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
> >
> Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
>> From: Jonathan Wakely
>> Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" ,
>> Jonny Grant
>>
>> These files are only compiled by GCC's own build system, with GCC's
>> own makefiles, so we know we invoke the C
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" ,
> Jonny Grant
>
> These files are only compiled by GCC's own build system, with GCC's
> own makefiles, so we know we invoke the C++ compiler and so the
> language isn't inferred from the fi
> From: DJ Delorie
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jonny Grant
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:39:51 -0500
>
> However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
> (Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files ("+" is not a valid file
> name character on Windows, so we can't use .c++).
Actually,
> Am 31.01.2015 um 21:21 schrieb DJ Delorie :
>
>
>> Aren't current Windows file systems case-preserving? Then they
>> shouldn't have no problems with .C files.
>
> They are case preserving, but not case sensitive. A wildcard search
> for *.c will match foo.C and bar.c, and foo.c can be opene
> Aren't current Windows file systems case-preserving? Then they
> shouldn't have no problems with .C files.
They are case preserving, but not case sensitive. A wildcard search
for *.c will match foo.C and bar.c, and foo.c can be opened as FOO.C.
31.01.2015 14:10, Florian Weimer writes:
> Aren't current Windows file systems case-preserving? Then they
> shouldn't have no problems with .C files.
They are, but with some limitations: you can't create two files with
names differing only by case. I didn't try API functions, but here is
how it
* DJ Delorie:
> pins...@gmail.com writes:
>> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
>
> However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
> (Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files
Aren't current Windows file systems case-preserving? Then they
shouldn't have no p
John Marino writes:
> Even if this issue is normally hidden due to gcc's makefiles
There are no makefiles involved.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On 1/31/2015 02:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 30 January 2015 at 21:39, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>> pins...@gmail.com writes:
>>> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
>>
>> However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
>> (Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files
; rather than add a third extension.
Oh, I did not know this detail since I haven’t peered into the GCC source in a
felt forever. Would make sense to use .cc then if it has already been used
elsewhere in the source.
On 30 January 2015 at 22:24, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
> Apple’s HFS is, on a default OS X install, case insensitive.
Which doesn't matter, see my previous reply.
> But .c++ is valid. .cxx sounds pretty straight forward to me, since people
> also use the $CXX variable.
We already
On 30 January 2015 at 21:39, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> pins...@gmail.com writes:
>> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
>
> However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
> (Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files ("+" is not a valid file
> name character on Window
> Am 30.01.2015 um 22:39 schrieb DJ Delorie :
>
>
> pins...@gmail.com writes:
>> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
>
> However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
> (Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files ("+" is not a valid file
> name character on
> Am 30.01.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Jonny Grant :
>
>
>
> On 30/01/15 17:09, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
>>> capital extension. Its not a big
pins...@gmail.com writes:
> No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
However, we should avoid relying on case-sensitive file systems
(Windows) and use .cc or .cxx for C++ files ("+" is not a valid file
name character on Windows, so we can't use .c++).
On 30/01/15 17:09, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Jonny Grant wrote:
Hello
When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
capital extension. Its not a big issue.. but I wondered if they should
be .c like regular source files?
No because they a
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Jonny Grant wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
> capital extension. Its not a big issue.. but I wondered if they should
> be .c like regular source files?
No because they are c++ code so capital C is correct.
Hello
When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
capital extension. Its not a big issue.. but I wondered if they should
be .c like regular source files?
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\static_ctor.C
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\dropref.C
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\eh-1.C
libit
Thank you very much for the quick help!!
Let me look into the articles & contact you for further help.
On 8/21/14, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 21 August 2014 00:31, Tomsy Paul wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
>> gcc to suit my lang
On 21 August 2014 00:31, Tomsy Paul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
> gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex & yacc. I went
> through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
> source file.
>
> I prefer to mo
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Tomsy Paul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
> gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex & yacc. I went
> through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
> source file.
>
> I pref
Hello,
I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex & yacc. I went
through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
source file.
I prefer to modify the C compiler.
Can you please explain the source fi
Thx,Jonathan.
--
Regards
lin zuojian
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:37:01AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 March 2014 07:00, lin zuojian wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > How do I set the format of vim,so that my code doen't look alien?
>
> Do you mean how do you set vim to match the GCC coding style
On 3 March 2014 07:00, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi guys,
> How do I set the format of vim,so that my code doen't look alien?
Do you mean how do you set vim to match the GCC coding style?
It's not quite right, and it's mostly used for C++, but I use:
setl formatoptions=croql cindent cinoptions=:0
Hi guys,
How do I set the format of vim,so that my code doen't look alien?
--
Regards
lin zuojian
On 18/03/13 18:50, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
On 3/18/13, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I have been having discussion with Andrew about uses of anonymous
namespaces in GCC source code. I seem to remember that they used
to cause troubles when doing binary diff during bootsrap because
we use random names
Jason Merrill writes:
| On 03/18/2013 10:57 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > I have been having discussion with Andrew about uses of anonymous
| > namespaces in GCC source code. I seem to remember that they used to
| > cause troubles when doing binary diff during bootsrap becau
On 3/18/13, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> I have been having discussion with Andrew about uses of anonymous
> namespaces in GCC source code. I seem to remember that they used
> to cause troubles when doing binary diff during bootsrap because
> we use random names to ensure uniqueness o
Hi Jason, Lawrence,
I have been having discussion with Andrew about uses of anonymous
namespaces in GCC source code. I seem to remember that they used to
cause troubles when doing binary diff during bootsrap because we use
random names to ensure uniqueness of names; but are we still doing that
On 03/18/2013 10:57 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I have been having discussion with Andrew about uses of anonymous
namespaces in GCC source code. I seem to remember that they used to
cause troubles when doing binary diff during bootsrap because we use
random names to ensure uniqueness of names
swati raina writes:
> Now , i recompiled the gcc using following commands,
>
> 1)Changed to path to build directory,
>
> cd /home/swati/newgcc/objdir/build-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/build/
>
> 2) Configured with --disable-bootstrap modification.
>
> /home/swati/newgcc/gcc-4.4.2/configure --disable-
Hi,
I am working with gcc 4.4.2.
I installed the same on my machine using the following command lines.
1)To extract in a new directory,i used,
mkdir gcc1
cd gcc1
tar -xvf gcc-4.4.2.tar.gz
set srcdir = "/home/swati/gcc1/gcc-4.4.2"
set objdir = "/home/swati/gcc1/gcc-bin"
set insdir = "/home/swati
Hello Ian
On 03.10.08, you wrote:
>> but the func
>>
>> push_parm_decl
>>
>> have no parameter asmspec_tree.
>
> It shouldn't need one.
>
> I'm not sure what the semantics of this should be. Are you trying to
> change the calling convention for a function? Should it change what
> callers
Bernd Roesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this best List to get help for GCC coding problems ?
Probably.
> but the func
>
> push_parm_decl
>
> have no parameter asmspec_tree.
It shouldn't need one.
I'm not sure what the semantics of this should be. Are you trying to
change the calling
parameter asmspec_tree.
is there a way to get access to it, without many code changes, or below func
can use in a better place ?
the amigaos target need that functions.
does somebody can tell me a more
easy way to add this feature, so not so many gcc source must change when
make a amiga OS Port ?.
ut many code changes, or below func
can use to a better place ?
the amiga os target need that functions.does somebody can tell me a more
easy way to add this feature, so not so many gcc source must change when
make a amiga OS Port ?.
here is a short testprog to see what need.it is the featur
Seema Ravandale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Rohan Sreeram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 4:17:12 AM
Subject: Re: How to use gcc source and try new optmization techniques
Rohan,
Welcome to GCC and I hope you achieve what you want. I would recommend
, 2008 11:35:10 PM
Subject: Re: How to use gcc source and try new optmization techniques
Hi Rohan,
I have already worked on cfg data structure, plugin "data flow pass" on cfg.
For this purpose, following links would be useful.
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday/gcc-workshop/?file=downl
anks,
Rohan
- Original Message
From: Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rohan Sreeram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:30:07 PM
Subject: Re: How to use gcc source and try new optmization techniques
I'm in a similar position, but some pointers.
> 1) Und
Rohan,
Welcome to GCC and I hope you achieve what you want. I would recommend
you check our wiki:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki
which has some very useful links:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted
It is a wiki, so feel free to correct mistakes, improve stuff and add
links. If you want to create
Hi Rohan,
I have already worked on cfg data structure, plugin "data flow pass" on cfg.
For this purpose, following links would be useful.
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday/gcc-workshop/?file=downloads
more info can be available at
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/
- Seema
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6
Hi,
I may not have correctly understood your questions but from what I
understand I think you mean to ask how you could easily plug in your
optimization pass into GCC so as to test your implementation of some
optimization.
Well, the way to do that would be to understand the pass structure and
dec
Hi,
I am a student in Utah State University researching on compilers optimization
techniques.
I wanted to know how I could use gcc for experimenting with optimization.
Here is what I intend to do:
1) Understand the control flow graphs being generated by GCC, which I could
build using the -fdum
NightStrike wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Abhijat Vichare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:59 +0800, =?GB2312?B?wbqI0g==?= wrote:
> But still, I cannot manage the source code of gcc.
> I don't know how to start reading it.
You can try: http://www.cfdvs.iitb.a
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Abhijat Vichare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:59 +0800, =?GB2312?B?wbqI0g==?= wrote:
>
> > But still, I cannot manage the source code of gcc.
> > I don't know how to start reading it.
>
> You can try: http://www.cfdvs.iitb.ac.in/~amv/gcc-i
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:59 +0800, =?GB2312?B?wbqI0g==?= wrote:
> But still, I cannot manage the source code of gcc.
> I don't know how to start reading it.
You can try: http://www.cfdvs.iitb.ac.in/~amv/gcc-int-docs/#gccdocs
> Last night I want to read the code of symbol table used in gcc, I sea
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Hello All.
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:14, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
* on the positive side, GCC is still doing well and alive
Why Intel and MS compilers are surpassing it?
Honestly, I never coded last years on any Microsoft systems (exc
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Aaron Gray wrote:
* what is the proportion of cross-compilation? I have no real clue.
I would suppose that during all the GCC runs in the last month, only a
minority was cross-compilation (for some embedded systems). Of these,
what are the favorite target machines
Aaron Gray wrote:
* what is the proportion of cross-compilation? I have no real clue.
I would suppose that during all the GCC runs in the last month, only a
minority was cross-compilation (for some embedded systems). Of these,
what are the favorite target machines & systems. I really don't kn
Aaron Gray wrote:
* what is the proportion of cross-compilation? I have no real clue.
I would suppose that during all the GCC runs in the last month, only a
minority was cross-compilation (for some embedded systems). Of these,
what are the favorite target machines & systems. I really don't kn
* what is the proportion of cross-compilation? I have no real clue. I
would suppose that during all the GCC runs in the last month, only a
minority was cross-compilation (for some embedded systems). Of these, what
are the favorite target machines & systems. I really don't know this one
(maybe
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Here are some answers from a PS3 prosective.
The mean code size is around 200 million lines or so. The final
binary results anywhere between 20 Megs to 40 Megs.
Are you sure of that figure? 200MLOC for a single program? That is huge!
Even for all the software installed
Here are some answers from a PS3 prosective.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * about X thousands developers run GCC at least once in the last
> month (I would imagine X is more than 100, ie more 100K developers are
> using GCC)
Right now all o
Hello All.
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:14, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
* on the positive side, GCC is still doing well and alive
I did not meant that everything is perfect. But I would not qualify GCC
as a sick or dead project. This is why I wrote "doing well & alive"
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:14, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> > Actually you ask an interesting & difficult question. Some thoughts from
> > somebody who works on GCC for more than a year but still considers
> > himsel
On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:14, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Actually you ask an interesting & difficult question. Some thoughts from
> somebody who works on GCC for more than a year but still considers
> himself a newbie:
>
> * my impression is that nobody understands fully the GCC compiler.
On 22/03/2008, 梁�� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any advice to be invovled in development of gcc ?
> Thank you very much.
> Sorry for disturbing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted
My advice would be:
* Narrowly focus on what you are truly interested in: front-end,
middle-end, back-end.
Hello All
LiangKun 梁堃 wrote:
Hello, everyone :
I am learning compiler techniques. I want a live example. I also want to do my
contributions to open source. So I turn to gcc.
Last year I have added some instruction templates to one specific gcc
backend as a task in work.
I have read a little of
Hello, everyone :
I am learning compiler techniques. I want a live example. I also want to do my
contributions to open source. So I turn to gcc.
Last year I have added some instruction templates to one specific gcc
backend as a task in work.
I have read a little of "Using and Porting GCC".
But st
Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So is there an easy way to have some acceptable warnings in GCC?
See gcc/Makefile.in, look for -Wno-error.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fing
On 06 September 2007 16:55, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> 2. generated code: when some C files are generated, it may be hard to
> avoid some warnings, typically a generated C function might have unused
> arguments (which might be not very easy to detect at generation stage).
Generate "__attrib
Hello All,
In most of GCC source code, it is perfectly normal to expect that no
warnings should appear, even if the sources are compiled with -Wall or
more. Actually the GCC bootstrap process seems to require this.
However, I see some occasions where warnings might be quite difficult to
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile gcc 4.1 source (from debian). I need to be able
to compile it because I have to modify and add some code and
recompile. When I try to compile gcc I get the following error
message:
../.././fastjar/fastjar.texi:119: Unknown command `gcctabopt'.
../.././fastjar/fastja
Thanks a lot David ,
You saved my time.
I have not installed bash earlier. When i installed the bash and
sat the environment varialble.
% CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/local/bin
% export CONFIG_SHELL
Then everything is OK. :)
AIX shell is not supported compiling GCC source code.
Rgs,
Kithsiri
On 7/24/06
>>>>> Kithsiri Lekamge writes:
Kithsiri> I am in great difficult compiling GCC source code in AIX box.
Kithsiri> I installed the binary of GCC 3.3.2 and using this compiler I started
Kithsiri> to compile the GCC 3.4.6 source codes.
Kithsiri> After 5 hrs of compilin
Hi All,
I am in great difficult compiling GCC source code in AIX box.
I installed the binary of GCC 3.3.2 and using this compiler I started
to compile the GCC 3.4.6 source codes.
After 5 hrs of compiling I received the following error.
46286 Segmentation fault:
Configure-target-libstdc++-v3
> I have C/C++/Java programming skills. I have also studied a couple
> of books on compiler development. I would like to start with a
> project that will provide me with the experience of having
> participated in a real compiler development effort. I am interested
> in C/C++/Java.
If you would lik
On 3/9/06, Lalit Gidwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have C/C++/Java programming skills. I have also
> studied a couple of books on compiler development. I
> would like to start with a project that will provide
> me with the experience of having participated in a
> real compiler development effo
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
