On 2 June 2013 19:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
>>> I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
>>> In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
>&g
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
>> I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
>> In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
>> In example code, is it really struct, not class?
> Ye
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
> In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
> In example code, is it really struct, not class?
Yes, that's valid C++, the example is fine.
Hi,
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct, not class?
BR,
Jurgis