"Brian O'Mahoney" writes:
>
> Last, a word to the wise, compiler developers, are by nature fairly agressive
> but, unless you want to work on gcc itself, it is wise to stay a bit behind
> the bleeding edge, and, unless your systems are excellently backed up,
> ___DONT_BUILD_THE_KERNEL___ with an
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Brian O'Mahoney wrote:
> OK, there are a few more things to say about gcc, and the kernel, and
> distributions (also the way patches to both work, to both).
>
> Stipulations: (a) I always try to run the current stable kernel, released by
> the
OK, there are a few more things to say about gcc, and the kernel, and
distributions (also the way patches to both work, to both).
Stipulations: (a) I always try to run the current stable kernel, released by
the 'stable-team' led by GKH. But he is getting too good, stable is
2.6.27.1
