Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

2005-09-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 26, 2005, at 12:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: I was missing the *back* slash. I guess it is actually make RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=eh\\*.C' $ make RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=eh\*.C check-g++ or $ make RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=eh*.C' check-g++ Once you get past local shell quoting, you're ok.

Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

2005-09-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
make RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=nothrow-1.C" check-g++ This one I know of. dg.exp=eh\*.C is another one. I was missing the *back* slash. I guess it is actually make RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=eh\\*.C' to get the correct escaping when RUNTESTFLAGS is expanded? Thanks, Paolo

Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

2005-09-25 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 25, 2005, at 7:58 PM, Ben Elliston wrote: make RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=nothrow-1.C" check-g++ dg.exp=eh\*.C is another one. dg.exp=file1.C,file2.C I think was another spelling.

Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

2005-09-25 Thread Ben Elliston
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I have noticed that g++.dg does not have one .exp file per directory, > and I could not figure out how to run, say, a single test case in the > g++.dg/tree-ssa directory. > > Would the patch be acceptable for 4.1? What about 4.2? If not, how do > I achieve the same result?

g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

2005-09-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
I have noticed that g++.dg does not have one .exp file per directory, and I could not figure out how to run, say, a single test case in the g++.dg/tree-ssa directory. I have modified g++.dg/dg.exp to do so, by using "glob" rather than "find", and then I could copy dg.exp to all the directories