On 2005-04-18, at 04:37, Gareth Pearce wrote:
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work
around is
to m
Thanks for the verification!
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
> > So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
> > and
> > runs fine on gcc 3.3.
> >
> > Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
>
On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work
around is
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work around is
to move the specific declaration above the template d
