Re: devbranches: ambigous characterisation of branches

On 7 June 2015 at 21:28, Wolfgang Hospital wrote: > in the repository contents description at > , numerous branch names are > listed as inactive, with some further comments. Right at the start there is > the longest list of such names, followed by "These

devbranches: ambigous characterisation of branches

Dear Sir or Madam, in the repository contents description at , numerous branch names are listed as inactive, with some further comments. Right at the start there is the longest list of such names, followed by "These branches have been merged into t