On 08/12/2014 12:20 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 12/08/14 07:49, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi Vladimir!
I think you are as the main IRA contributor would be appropriate person to
answer question bellow. Please confirm or refute my statement
On 12/08/14 07:49, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir!
>>
>> I think you are as the main IRA contributor would be appropriate person to
>> answer question bellow. Please confirm or refute my statement about
>> unsplittable register ranges i
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
> Hi Vladimir!
>
> I think you are as the main IRA contributor would be appropriate person to
> answer question bellow. Please confirm or refute my statement about
> unsplittable register ranges in GCC IRA.
>
>
> On 07/30/2014 05:38 PM, Marat
Hi Vladimir!
I think you are as the main IRA contributor would be appropriate person
to answer question bellow. Please confirm or refute my statement about
unsplittable register ranges in GCC IRA.
On 07/30/2014 05:38 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi there!
My question came from bug
https://gcc.g
Hi there!
My question came from bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725. I found that GCC
considers NEON register ranges as unsplittable. So any subregister may
be used only after whole chunk is dead. This issue leads to redundant
spill fills which is performance trouble.
Exam
