On 22/12/12 10:13, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Dec 20, 2012, "Paulo Matos" wrote:
This doesn't look sensible to me (but I might be overlooking a reason why we
want to do so) in the context of cselib_record_sets, however, I think
cselib_record_sets should instead have the patch applied:
- for_e
On Dec 20, 2012, "Paulo Matos" wrote:
> This doesn't look sensible to me (but I might be overlooking a reason why we
> want to do so) in the context of cselib_record_sets, however, I think
> cselib_record_sets should instead have the patch applied:
> - for_each_inc_dec (&insn, cselib_record_aut
Subject: Re: Fwd: cselib_record_set breaks due to auto_inc_dec
if i had to guess what was going on here, and since i do not have the
example or even know the platform, i am just guessing, i would say that
at some earlier pass, the sub expression in the regnote and the second
set in the parallel were
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Kenneth Zadeck
> Sent: 20 December 2012 12:46
> To: David Edelsohn; GCC Development
> Subject: Re: Fwd: cselib_record_set breaks due to auto_inc_dec
>
> if i had to
set breaks due to auto_inc_dec
To: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org"
Hi,
After pro and epilogue pass I have the following epilogue insn:
(insn/f 20 19 21 2 (parallel [
(set (mem:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI 26 r26)
(reg/f:SI 57 r57)) [0 S8 A8])
(reg:DI 57 r57
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
> Matos
> Sent: 19 December 2012 17:00
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: cselib_record_set breaks due to auto_inc_dec
>
> Hi,
>
> After pro and epil
Hi,
After pro and epilogue pass I have the following epilogue insn:
(insn/f 20 19 21 2 (parallel [
(set (mem:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI 26 r26)
(reg/f:SI 57 r57)) [0 S8 A8])
(reg:DI 57 r57))
(set (reg/f:SI 57 r57)
(plus:SI (r
