On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
Also, sometimes it happens that a file will start as trivial/non-
trivial, and then later modifications will change it to non-trivial/
trivial, but the patcher doesn't bother to add/remove the copyright
notice. Just like sometimes people forget t
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Then why does config/rs6000/gnu.h have one, it is more trivial than
the others.
Different people writing different files at different times making
different interpretations of the same rule.
Also, sometimes it happens that a file will start as
trivial/non-trivial, and t
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:49 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
They are (or were) non-trivial enough not to require a copyright
notice.
Then why does config/rs6000/gnu.h have one, it is more trivial than
the others.
-- Pinski
They are (or were) non-trivial enough not to require a copyright
notice.
I obviously mean that they were _trivial_ enough not to require a
copyright notice.
Is there a reason why both config/gnu.h and config/i386/gnu.h don't
include copyright notices or even the license they are under. Does
that mean they are in the public domain or did someone mess up when
contributing them?
They are (or were) non-trivial enough not to require a copyrigh
Is there a reason why both config/gnu.h and config/i386/gnu.h don't
include copyright
notices or even the license they are under. Does that mean they are
in the public
domain or did someone mess up when contributing them?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
