Hi Kaveh,
Andreas Tobler wrote:
On mainline only (not 4.2 or prior) does this work instead?
Yep, trunk.
[ultra10:gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg] andreast% diff -u
/usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.orig /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h
--- /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.origMon Feb 4 21:55:29 2008
+++ /usr/in
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Great, we're making progress.
On mainline only (not 4.2 or prior) does this work instead?
Yep, trunk.
[ultra10:gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg] andreast% diff -u
/usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.orig /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h
--- /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.origMon Feb 4 21:55
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ultra10:gcc/gcc/testsuite] andreast% svn diff gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
Index: gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
===
--- gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c (revision 132096)
+++ gcc.dg/c99-math-double-
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Okay, thanks both of you for tracking this down.
So the solaris definition of isinf is not exception-safe in the presence
of nans. Try inserting this code into c99-math-double-1.c after it
includes math headers. (This is what fixincludes puts into the header
for solar
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rainer Orth wrote:
In c99-math-double-1.c, the first C99_MATH_TESTS invocation abort()s.
Single-stepping in gdb (which couldn't display the macro, even if
compiled
with -g3 ;-) revealed that this clause
if (fetestexcept (FE_ALL_EXCEPT) != 0) \
a
Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Kaveh,
I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
begs the question, why do these fix
Hi Kaveh,
> I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
> on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
> GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
> begs the question, why do these fix hacks have th
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
the libm sources, including math_c99.h, are available for download from
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/devpro/downloads/current/
R
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
I don't have solaris11 either.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there
a
GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And
that
begs the question, why do these fix hacks have this GNUC bypass in the
first
place?
Because I gav
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
> GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
> begs the question, why do these fix hacks have this GNUC bypass in the first
> place?
Because I ga
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Kaveh,
[...]
Hm, there is no iso/math_c99.h and I guess the reason is here:
From the /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h
#pragma ident "@(#)math_c99.h 1.1207/01/21 SMI"
From the fixincl.x:
tSCC zSolaris_Math_1Select0[] =
"@\\(#\\)math_c99.h[ \t]
Hi Kaveh,
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
I've never had access to solaris 11, and my earlier access to solaris 10
(where these tests worked) is gone, would you please tell me why these
tests fail?
Which of the if clauses in c99-math.h is aborting and which of the
solaris_math_* fixincludes are successf
Hi guys,
I'm noticing that the c99-math tests are getting execute failures on
solaris2.11 for gcc-4.2.3 amd mainline. (I don't know about 4.1.x.).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00197.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01460.html
I've never had access to sol
14 matches
Mail list logo
