> James E Wilson
>> Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>> * We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
>> DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
>> advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
>
> GCC has little support for non-power-of-2
> "James" == James E Wilson writes:
James> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
>> I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
>> (http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
James> Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
James> end-of-lifed abo
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
> I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
> (http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
end-of-lifed about 2 decades ago has little chance of success, unless
there are some v
> "James" == James E Wilson writes:
James> Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>> * We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On
>> this DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC
>> take advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
James> GCC
Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
* We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
GCC has little support for non-power-of-2 sized accumulators.
Traditionall
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:57PM -0400, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>Me and Brian Richter are in the early development stage of the TI
> C54x DSP port of GCC. We have some technical/project management questions.
> I'll
> keep it short, so here it is:
>
> * How do we officially becom
Hello every one,
Me and Brian Richter are in the early development stage of the TI
C54x DSP port of GCC. We have some technical/project management questions. I'll
keep it short, so here it is:
* How do we officially become maintainers of this port ? We are presently in the
process of filling ou
Bryan Richter wrote:
Can someone assist me in getting the necessary copyright assignment
forms?
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
for info on how to get the process started.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com
ng it over for a day, I now realize that developing it separately is
not wise. As such, I'm now volunteering to develop the c54x port directly in the
main tree. Can someone assist me in getting the necessary copyright assignment
forms?
Thanks,
-Bryan
--
Bryan Richter
UCDTT President
UC Davi
Joe Buck wrote:
> Maybe not so cool, unless you are careful. The problem is that if you
> don't keep track of who submitted what, or if you accept some critical
> code from someone who is either unwilling or unable to legally contribute
> their work to the FSF, it can never be accepted as part of
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:10:19PM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote:
> I am working on porting GCC to the TI C54x.
Cool.
> months, similar to others who have attempted this project, but I am now
> in the process of setting up a repository on BerliOS so I can work with
> others.
Maybe not so cool, unle
Hello everyone,
I am working on porting GCC to the TI C54x. I have worked alone for a few
months, similar to others who have attempted this project, but I am now in the
process of setting up a repository on BerliOS so I can work with others. Thus,
the primary purpose of this email is to introduce
12 matches
Mail list logo
