2013/6/22 Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
>> Like this?
>>
>> ===
>> --- libgcc/Makefile.in (revision 200306)
>> +++ libgcc/Makefile.in (working copy)
>> @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@
>> .PHONY: all
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> Like this?
>
> ===
> --- libgcc/Makefile.in (revision 200306)
> +++ libgcc/Makefile.in (working copy)
> @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@
> .PHONY: all clean
>
> clean:
> - -rm -f aut
2013/6/22 Andreas Schwab :
> Chung-Ju Wu writes:
>
>> clean:
>> - -rm -f auto-target.h libgcc_tm.h libgcc.map
>> + -rm -f libgcc_tm.h libgcc.map
>> -rm -f libgcc_tm.stamp stamp-h stmp-ldirs
>
> Same for stamp-h.
>
Like this?
==
Chung-Ju Wu writes:
> clean:
> - -rm -f auto-target.h libgcc_tm.h libgcc.map
> + -rm -f libgcc_tm.h libgcc.map
> -rm -f libgcc_tm.stamp stamp-h stmp-ldirs
Same for stamp-h.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 0
2013/6/22 Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> A make clean followed by a make in the libgcc directory results in:
>>
>> ../../../../gcc/libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:23:25: fatal error:
>> auto-target.h: No such file or directory
>> #include "auto-target.h"
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> A make clean followed by a make in the libgcc directory results in:
>
> ../../../../gcc/libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:23:25: fatal error:
> auto-target.h: No such file or directory
> #include "auto-target.h"
>
> Oh, the the old days, we'd just
Mike Stump writes:
> A make clean followed by a make in the libgcc directory results in:
>
> ../../../../gcc/libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:23:25: fatal error:
> auto-target.h: No such file or directory
> #include "auto-target.h"
>
> Oh, the the old days, we'd just add a dependancy… If someone kn
A make clean followed by a make in the libgcc directory results in:
../../../../gcc/libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:23:25: fatal error: auto-target.h:
No such file or directory
#include "auto-target.h"
Oh, the the old days, we'd just add a dependancy… If someone knows where to add
just the right