Re: bad reassociation with signed integer code after PR45232.

2012-09-24 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote: > Hi, > I noticed some minor regression with singed integer operations in "the > proprietary" code since > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45232. Of course, I could > use "-fwrapv" flag but my question is: why we could not add

bad reassociation with signed integer code after PR45232.

2012-09-24 Thread Dinar Temirbulatov
Hi, I noticed some minor regression with singed integer operations in "the proprietary" code since http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45232. Of course, I could use "-fwrapv" flag but my question is: why we could not add overflow checking in for example int_const_binop() at fold-const.c fo