> > Indeed I disagree. I'm not aware of any commercial interests on the FSF
> > GCC side. As far as I can recall, the split was between the commercial
> > interests on the EGCS side and the non-commercial interests on the FSF
> > side.
>
> It was not anywhere near that simple; there were a numbe
> I could say much more (there are interesting stories about the
> behind-the-scenes politics) but it's off-topic.
Please think about writing a book telling the whole story when the dust will
have settled. :-)
--
Eric Botcazou
What an interesting and unproductive discussion but I hope it ends
here or should I call somebody "a member of a German political party
very popular around 1940"? :-)
Cheers,
Manuel.
On 02/03/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:10:22AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrot
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:10:22AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > And indeed, while this is a controversial statement with which
> > some people will disagree, I believe that that split was caused in
> > part by commercial interests on both sides of the split (and I was
> > there at the time).
>
