Hi David,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 1:01 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > ?
>
> Yes; please submit it, so that we can work towards getting what you
> have into trunk.
>
> Given that we don't properly support C++ yet, improvements to C++
> support don't have to be perfect.
>
>
It is next in queue for
On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 17:13 +0200, Benjamin Priour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Test gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94362-1.c actually has an additional
> null_deref
> > warning in C++, which is not affected by exceptions
> > or optimizations. I will keep updated on that one. Note that no
> > warnings
> > are emitted for
On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 16:44 +0200, Benjamin Priour wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Sorry I missed out on your answer about the operator new patch on the
> IRC.
> Should I submit the first bit of the operator new patch ? Putting
> aside for
> now fixing the
> "uninitialized value" that accompanies "null der
Hi,
Test gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94362-1.c actually has an additional null_deref
> warning in C++, which is not affected by exceptions
> or optimizations. I will keep updated on that one. Note that no warnings
> are emitted for this test in C.
>
> analyzer/pr94362-1.c: In function ‘const EVP_PKEY_ASN1_M
Hi David,
Sorry I missed out on your answer about the operator new patch on the IRC.
Should I submit the first bit of the operator new patch ? Putting aside for
now fixing the
"uninitialized value" that accompanies "null deref" of nothrow new variants
?
About generalizing tests to C++, I'll soon
