Re: a mistake in gccint doc

2009-05-15 Thread Eric Fisher
2009/5/16 Diego Novillo : > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:12, Eric Fisher wrote: > >> I think it's a mistake between a and b. It should be, >> >> " >> variable @code{a} is completely modified with the contents of >> variable @code{b}.  Real definition are also known as @dfn{killing >> definitions}.  

Re: a mistake in gccint doc

2009-05-15 Thread Diego Novillo
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:12, Eric Fisher wrote: > I think it's a mistake between a and b. It should be, > > " > variable @code{a} is completely modified with the contents of > variable @code{b}.  Real definition are also known as @dfn{killing > definitions}.  Similarly, the use of @code{b} read

a mistake in gccint doc

2009-05-14 Thread Eric Fisher
Hello, In 'SSA Operands' node, tree-ssa.texi, the original text are " For instance, given @smallexample @{ int a, b; a = b @} @end smallexample Since @code{a} and @code{b} are non-aliased locals, the statement @code{a = b} will have one real definition and one real use because variable @cod