Re: __gcc_cpu_feature

2005-11-08 Thread Paolo Carlini
Richard Guenther wrote: >What would be interesting to know, is what architectures apart from ia32 will >likely profit from this? > A quick comment about this: *many*. It's not only about i386 vs i486+, it's about all the arches that don't have the builtins *currently* implemented not because of fu

Re: __gcc_cpu_feature

2005-11-08 Thread Richard Guenther
On 11/8/05, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > >Just to put some more thoughts on the table, I'm about to propose adding > >a __gcc_cpu_feature symbol to $suitable_place, similar to what Intel is > >doing with its __intel_c

__gcc_cpu_feature

2005-11-08 Thread Paolo Carlini
Richard Guenther wrote: >Just to put some more thoughts on the table, I'm about to propose adding >a __gcc_cpu_feature symbol to $suitable_place, similar to what Intel is >doing with its __intel_cpu_indicator which is used in their runtime libraries >to select different co